I was around for the Kennedy vs Nixon election in 1960. I was too young to vote but I did follow the election closely since Kennedy was a fellow Bay Stater. One of the arguments against Kennedy was that as a Catholic, he would be under the thumb of the pope. That was ludicrous, but back in the Middle Ages it would have been a legitimate concern.
Look at Pope Boniface VIII. In 1302 he declared you couldn’t even get into Heaven unless you did everything he said. It hadn’t always been like that. The first few popes were saintly men who avoided politics. They ministered to their flock while trying to avoid state persecution. When Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire in the fourth century and the money and perks began to flow, everything changed.
By the eighth century various kings and emperors began donating parcels of land to the church for political reasons, and the Pope eventually became a major player in European affairs. The Pope had his own army to back up his will. The other major players at the time were France and the Holy Roman Empire (modern Germany) with England messing about on the fringes.
It was a dispute with the king of France that led Boniface to issue his pronouncement or bull on this day in 1302 telling every one he was boss. The French King, Philip the Fair had started taxing the French clergy at a rate of 50% which doesn’t sound very fair. Boniface got upset because he was counting on that money to run his own country.
The dispute with Philip had been going on for years before Boniface issued his bull. He tried diplomacy first and when that didn’t work Boniface excommunicated Philip. Philip in turn convinced the French upper clergy to proclaim Boniface a sinner.
One of Philip’s advisors gathered a gang of mercenaries and attacked Boniface’s home castle outside Rome. They locked Boniface up for three days without food until his supporters were able to rescue him. Boniface returned to St. Peter’s in Rome but died a few months later of a ”profound chagrin”.
Then the really crazy stuff began. The new pope was French and he moved his throne north to Avignon in present day France. Seventy years and six popes later the pope moved back to Rome then quickly changed his mind and headed back to Avignon which precipitated a crisis leading to a spell of three popes at the same time.
The Catholic Church itself is a bit fuzzy about who was a real pope and who wasn’t. It must be embarrassing. Here is an explanation from the Vatican's PR department. "Dear people, there have been 260 popes give or take an anti-pope or two. It all happened so long ago and isn’t our present pope such a lovely pope? Now please enjoy your visit to Vatican City."
Things move slowly in Vatican City. The marble list is two popes behind. |
You know, you should've been a history teacher. Your posts often enlighten me on subjects that I'm aware of, read about, or thought I understood in their entirety -- and probably in the past sixty some years, researched to some infantile degree but this definition of a 'papal bull' ranks right at the top of the list, particularly in regard to the well-publicized papal bull of 1493 i.e., "Manifest Destiny" https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nativevoices/timeline/171.html, in which Pope Alexander VI issues a papal bull or decree, “Inter Caetera," in which he authorizes Spain and Portugal to colonize the Americas and its Native peoples as subjects. The decree asserts the rights of Spain and Portugal to colonize, convert, and enslave. It also justifies the enslavement of Africans.
ReplyDeleteSo Prof, is this the origin of the often-used exclamation, "That's alot of bull!" ?
Indubitably
DeleteI don't suppose adding s**t after "bull" would go very far, and if I were Catholic, would surely get me excommunicated; this is similar to a 14th century English law that forbid anyone to even think about the sovereign's death. Pope = king/queen? We'll never know.
ReplyDeleteBLH and I are just finishing "A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century," wherein much is made of the multiple popes, including the Avignon guy and others you mention. Here is the list:
Pope Clement VI: 1342–1352. Pope Innocent VI: 1352–1362. Pope Urban V: 1362–1370 (in Rome 1367–1370; returned to Avignon 1370) Pope Gregory XI: 1370–1378 (left Avignon to return to Rome on September 13, 1376).
In addition, a schism was afoot making for the common-man/woman Catholic even more confused. Perhaps the times called for a Baskin Robbins approach.
Seriously, your post shows how much we can learn from the past, if only we WOULD learn. The good news is that humanity remains a pretty decent species despite rampant confusions.
Finally, let's hear it for any guy who would willingly take on the leadership of the Catholic world. Think about it. Just don't put me up for a criminal for my dim-wittedness. Sacrilege. Lack of PC. Ignorance. Or whatever else comes to mind about this comment.
Happy St. Constant Day!
ReplyDelete