I was reading through an article on MSN the other day (I know...first mistake!) and decided to leave a comment, or more precisely, respond to a comment. The original poster was on one side of an issue, and ended by saying that doing "X" wasn't smart. My response was that not doing "X" wasn't smart. MSN decided that my comment was harassment and said that my comment had been removed for that reason. I found that quite amusing. So I posted another comment. In this one I said that I agreed with everything in the article. That was all I said. It was rejected for harassment again. This tickled me to no end! I am aware that it AI that decides whether a comment is in violation of their community standards. And I am also aware that MSN doesn't really like to receive comments that lean to the right a little. Not sure what the huge problem with the above comment was though. Maybe being too agreeable? Who can say!...
Every so often, Chairman Joe mentions his Bottle Run trips to Thief River Falls. I admire his environmental consciousness, and I smile when he describes the biscuit-and-gravy breakfasts he eats there with Steve, Joe, or whoever happens to be his latest partner in crime. Deep down, though, I cringe. When it comes to recyclable glassware, I have a complicated relationship. When I was little, I always loved the Zarex bottles—the clear ones with the inviting jug handle. One gracious pour of fruit syrup into a simple glass of water could transform a sweaty summer day. Another favorite was the Ovaltine jar. The cardboard carton of Nesquik—powdery and overly sweet—tried, but failed, to cure my aversion to milk. Because, in those days, children were required to drink it, my mother finally took a risk and bought the more expensive chocolate Ovaltine instead. The squat, brown jar that held those crunchy, malted granules delivered the heft of security, saving me—day after day—from standoffs over ...