Skip to main content

5 Feb 2018 . . . "And Now . . ."

As promised one week ago, and for the foreseeable future, Mondays will be devoted to poetry, its riddles, and potential solutions to those riddles. This approach is unusual, if not unique, because almost all poets distain revealing the meanings of their poems, which are guarded like some top secret war strategy. The Monday strategy aims to invite readers to discover these “secret” meanings, and the good news is that a poem is not only a riddle, but has as many solutions/answers as there are readers. That is one of the beauties of the poetic form. This approach is meant to fire the imagination and stoke creativity. The sort of bad news is that once a reader interprets a poem, he/she may still wonder if the meaning ferreted out is correct. Fear not, intrepid poetry stalkers; the meaning of a poem is yours and yours alone. There is no right answer.

A little background: I’ve been writing poetry since I learned to write. You might say I feel in love with words very young, first enabled by a Notre Dame nun, when I was in first grade. On the first day of that school year, that nun held up a piece of construction paper with the capital letters G -O- D written large with some sort of black magic marker. Yellow rays of sun radiated from the letters. She explained that these mysterious lines and curves spelled God, that the letters were only a few of many, and that they stood for all we know of heaven and the world. Wow! I thought. That’s really amazing! Every single thing has its own letters, and if I learn their meanings, I can capture anything I want – forever. I felt like Helen Keller when she discovered the link between water and its sign.

And I was off and running, eager to learn as many of these words as possible, so I could put them together myself and make meaning. I bugged my father to read me the funny papers and show me the words carefully so I could discover their secrets. I frustrated my mother with my simple spelling lessons, wanting to be certain I understood everything. And, as they say, the rest is history. Since those early days, I’ve written dozens, if not hundreds of poems, some not bad; some just awful – in my opinion. Quite a few have been published, and a few have won prizes. As we speak, I am waiting to hear from The New Yorker about poems I sent to them. Although I have no illusions, I’ll keep you posted on that.
I’ve rattled on long enough. Here you go, the first poem I offer, and following it, the real fun: keys to the poem’s secrets, its origins, its meanings. This poem is titled, “And Now?” Have fun and enjoy!

                        Nine years and now a baby?
                                    an interloper in Lorna’s straight, thin body.
                        John already happy carving cradles and chests
                        Suddenly his eyes and hands are elsewhere
                                    as if Lorna had become a fabrication machine
                                    off in a corner gestating his latest creation
                        No matter how poised she looked, hands on hips
                                    and chin haughty with former dreams of modeling
                        No matter how tight her thin sweaters hold her breasts
                                    growing full and glorious yet untouched, unworshipped –
                        John wore intensity like a high school quarterback
                                    intent on the game but not the girl

                        Now flowers from him – but not him
                                    sitting silent on the hospital bureau beside her bed
                        Cards and letters of congratulation – so many, so nice
                        In the basinet, the stranger – point of pain and toll
                                    on her body – always wanting – always needing –
                                    rarely quiet, not even for the bottle and of course
                                                never the breast, still hopeful

                        At two weeks, John still distracted, reads and studies
                                    all things infantile but rarely holds it
                                                and never her – never Lorna
                        “Just like her mother.” “Not much like John.”
                        Eyes dart from tiny face to parents and back again
                        “Maybe like her grandpa?” “Maybe just a little.”    
                        “All this time – nine years – and now a baby?”

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Clue # 1: Where did this poem come from? I was participating in a poets’ retreat near Brainerd, Minnesota. Each of us had crafted a writing exercise to engage the group. One of us handed each person a sizable album of photographs. We were to glance through the pictures, and when one caught our interest, we were to write about it. The photo that captured my attention featured a young couple, probably in their late twenties, standing side by side; she cradling a baby in her arms. She was quite attractive; his looks were more of the rugged, but not handsome, type. He looked directly into the camera while her focus was downward, regarding the infant.

Exploration #1: Why is the word “now” italicized twice?
Exploration #2: Who is the “him” referred to in the second stanza?
Exploration #3: How does Lorna feel about the baby? How does John regard it?
Exploration #4: Why, in the final stanza, do eyes “dart from tiny face to parents and back again?”

If anyone cares to comment on this piece and its clues, I will be pleased to supply a response.


JackPine Poet/Savage

Comments

  1. Musing on the 3 italicized words in light of your Explorations: "Now him; now?" or "Now? Him. Now him?"

    One could also speculate about the 4th italicized word - "And" - in the title.

    One wonders how different lines in the poem, especially Exploration #4, might reflect either Lorna, the poet, or both...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I very much like the change in meaning with the second suggested alteration: Now? Him. I'm going to incorporate that. Your observation caused me to notice yet another "now," the first word of the second stanza. Hmmm . . . to italicize or not to italicize? As for your third speculation, I assure you, the poem is strictly about Lorna (and her him or hims); the poet has no skin in this game.

      Delete
  2. As a poem neophyte i.e., someone who isn't particularly familiar with poetic alliteration, dactyl, epigraph, pentameter, spondee, or especially trochee (that one always gave me fits), I'll give your explorations a try nonetheless.

    #1 'now' suggests to me the pregnancy was accidental and so late in their marriage, that although they had talked about having a family when they first were married, they both had allowed the notion to fade since she had begun her career as a model and he had begun to consider another line of work, maybe as a writer. Then, when she became pregnant, he was re-energized, making baby things, etc. He had something to talk about at work, he had a future again as a Dad--but lost sight of her completely, 'now' in all her perfection and beauty in her metamorphosis as pregnancy transformed her body. His attentions were someplace else.

    #2 & #3 "Now flowers from 'him' ..." The first him, I think is the husband, the second him, the baby. The baby who she cannot satisfy has become a constant needy object. Her husband wants for nothing except the pride about the baby that he's embraced instead.

    #4 As friends and family come to view the baby, they make comparisons as to whom the baby resembles, what they don't see is the intimate disconnect between John and Lorna. She may think 'now' the baby has cost her John's affection, when in reality he lost it for her years before. He views the baby 'now' as just something to keep her occupied and off his back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your response and interpretation shout loudly that you are no neophyte when it comes to poetry. In fact, you seem to have a knack for it. Your #1 is right on target as this poet sees it. The only item I would question is Lorna's "former dreams of modeling." This implies that her dream career has never been realized. Small thing.

      #2-3: This comment is at least 50% on target. I think you've nailed the parents; however, I suggest considering another object of attention other than the baby for the second "him." This can't be because in the last stanza the onlookers refer to the baby when they say, "Just like her mother." So the baby is female. Who could the second "him" be? There is definitely a second "him." Combine this with the pregnancy and birth coming so late in the marriage. Could there be another explanation for this? Of course, I'm leaving you more clues to come up with an alternate interpretation for who the second "him" might be.

      Re: #4, again your insight about the parents is on target. You have found an important thread to follow when you pick up "he lost [his affection] for her years before." In addition, you might consider why the onlookers keep studying the parents compared/contrasted to the baby, as well as the second repetition of the statement/question, "and now a baby."

      Hope you had fun with this. You are a super sleuth when it comes to bringing out the diamonds of this poem. If you care to respond to the alternatives I've hinted at, go for it, but only if it's fun.

      JPS to WW

      Delete

Post a Comment